🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.